Atlas

 

Atlas (2024)

A Painfully Conventional Ride Through Sci-Fi Tropes

★★☆☆☆

A competent but derivative AI thriller that leans heavily on its star power and CGI budget.

Directed by Brad Peyton, Atlas is a competent, but painfully conventional science fiction and action feature. With standard, stereotypical characters and a plot obviously inspired by Blade Runner, Terminator, and Pacific Rim, the film struggles to carve out its own identity. On the plus side, the movie boasts some strong special effects and impressive production design for a straight-to-streaming title. Jennifer Lopez puts up a game effort, even if the material feels like a collection of ideas we've seen a half-dozen times before.

"Lopez has reached that level of fame where she can only be seen as herself despite her best intentions. In her defense, it's hard to picture this film being greenlit without her, considering how mediocre the material is."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Brad Peyton
• Starring: Jennifer Lopez, Simu Liu, Sterling K. Brown
• Voice Cast: Gregory James Cohan (Smith)
• Platform: Netflix

The Vision

Brad Peyton attempts to create a high-stakes "man vs. machine" odyssey, but the vision often gets lost in the generic beats of the script. Jennifer Lopez is undeniably watchable as she navigates the film, but she feels miscast as a brilliant but traumatized data analyst—a role that demands a level of character depth the superstar's massive public persona tends to overshadow. The film's strength lies in its visuals, which provide enough "eye candy" to keep the average viewer engaged through the predictably listless narrative.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• AI Resonance: The film's release coincided with a global surge in AI discourse, though critics noted that the screenplay actually predates the current ChatGPT era by several years.
• Physical Production: To help Lopez react to her robotic companion, the production used a real voice actor on set rather than just recording the lines in post-production.
• Netflix Numbers: Despite mixed critical reviews, Atlas debuted at #1 in over 90 countries on Netflix, proving Lopez's enduring global "greenlight" power.

✅ Pros

• Strong special effects and high-quality production design.
• Jennifer Lopez is a magnetic, pleasantly watchable presence.
• Functional action sequences for fans of the "mech" subgenre.

❌ Cons

• Derivative plot that feels like a collage of better sci-fi films.
• Jennifer Lopez feels miscast as a "traumatized analyst."
• Stereotypical characters and uninspired dialogue.

🏆 Final Verdict

A "comfort food" sci-fi flick that won't win any awards for originality. Atlas is a glossy, mid-tier spectacle that serves its purpose as a weekend stream but disappears from memory the moment the credits roll.

View original review on Letterboxd

Hit Man

 

Hit Man (2023)

A Rom-Com with a Wicked, Noir-Stained Twist

★★★☆☆

A charming fairy tale built on a dark foundation, confirmed by the electric charisma of its leads.

Directed by Richard Linklater, Hit Man overcomes suspense and noir film stereotypes by inserting much-needed, unexpected black comedy into the proceedings. While the script might read like a silly Lifetime thriller on the surface, Linklater’s steady comedic hand transforms this morbid story into something genuinely charming. The film hinges on the affable charisma of Glen Powell and Adria Arjona, an attractive and likeable couple that keeps the audience rooting for them even as the absurdity peaks in the third act.

"Linkletter's steady comedic hand transforms the morbid, dark story into something resembling a charming fairy tale. It all shouldn't really work."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Richard Linklater
• Starring: Glen Powell, Adria Arjona
• Writers: Richard Linklater & Glen Powell
• Based on: Skip Hollandsworth (Texas Monthly Article)

The Vision

Richard Linklater’s vision leans into the philosophical nature of identity, disguised as a breezy rom-com. By utilizing Glen Powell’s range through a series of "hit man" personas, the film explores how we perform ourselves for others. It manages to feel like a "star-making" turn for both leads, despite them both already being on strong trajectories toward superstardom. The direction ensures the film remains grounded in character even when the plot dips into traditional noir territory.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• True Story Roots: The film is loosely based on the real-life story of Gary Johnson, a staff investigator for the Harris County D.A.'s office who actually posed as a hitman over 60 times.
• Writing Duo: Glen Powell didn't just star; he co-wrote the screenplay with Linklater after discovering the original 2001 article in Texas Monthly.
• Persona Prep: Powell worked closely with the hair and makeup departments to create distinct looks for his various aliases, ranging from "American Psycho" chic to backwoods grit.

✅ Pros

• Electric chemistry between Glen Powell and Adria Arjona.
• Masterful tonal balance between black comedy and romance.
• Richard Linklater’s character-first directorial style.

❌ Cons

• Plot absurdity in the third act may stretch believability for some.
• On-paper premise can feel a bit like a generic thriller tropes.

🏆 Final Verdict

A confirmed success for its leads and a delightful genre-bender. Hit Man is proof that with the right talent and a steady hand, even the darkest premises can feel like magic.

View original review on Letterboxd

Remembering Gene Wilder

 

Remembering Gene Wilder (2023)

A Breezy, Background-Ready Highlight Reel

★★☆☆☆

A safe, non-controversial look at a comedy legend that serves better as a "time killer" than a definitive biography.

Directed by Ron Frank, Remembering Gene Wilder functions primarily as a highlight reel of the artist's iconic works. While it lightheartedly touches on his most famous films through the eyes of his colleagues, it lacks the depth one might expect for a talent of Wilder's magnitude. Most effective is the incorporation of narration from his own audiobook autobiography, but the film ultimately fails to offer anything groundbreaking or particularly insightful about his complex personal life or artistic process.

"Wilder's works merit a more extensive examination, as well as his interesting personal life. [It is] the kind of documentary that Netflix is unfortunately becoming famous for: time killers to put on in the background as one goes about their chores."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Ron Frank
• Starring: Gene Wilder (Archival), Mel Brooks, Alan Alda
• Supporting: Carol Kane, Harry Connick Jr., Karen Wilder
• Narration: Gene Wilder (via "Kiss Me Like a Stranger")

The Vision

The documentary aims to be a celebratory, nostalgic trip down memory lane rather than a deep investigative dive. While it successfully captures the "charitable" side of Wilder's legacy, the directorial vision is safe and non-confrontational. It relies heavily on familiar anecdotes and existing footage, missing the gear to make it truly special. It settles into the role of comfortable streaming content—perfect for passive consumption while tending to daily tasks, but leaving dedicated fans yearning for a more extensive examination.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Self-Told Story: The use of Wilder’s own voice from his 2005 memoir, Kiss Me Like a Stranger, allows the actor to essentially narrate his own life story from beyond the grave.
• Blooper Gold: Many viewers consider the rare, extended blooper reel from Young Frankenstein to be the absolute highlight of the documentary’s archival footage.
• Brooks' Blessing: Longtime collaborator Mel Brooks provided extensive new interview footage, offering a firsthand look at the chemistry that defined 1970s comedy.

✅ Pros

• Touchingly incorporates Gene Wilder’s own narration.
• Excellent archival bloopers, especially from Young Frankenstein.
• Breezy and easy to watch for casual fans.

❌ Cons

• Lacks deep insight or groundbreaking new information.
• Feels like surface-level "background" content.
• Avoids more complex or difficult aspects of Wilder’s life.

🏆 Final Verdict

A modest tribute that functions well as a "Greatest Hits" package. If you’re looking for a profound exploration of Wilder’s genius, you might be disappointed, but it’s a pleasant enough companion for a rainy afternoon.

View original review on Letterboxd

Brats

 

BRATS (2024)

Unpacking the Stigma of the "Brat Pack" Moniker

★★☆☆☆

An uneven examination that lightly scratches the surface of 80s stardom without delivering deep insight.

Directed by Andrew McCarthy, BRATS is an uneven examination of the group of actors famously labeled "The Brat Pack" by a notorious 1985 New York Magazine article. McCarthy attempts to unpack the lasting effects and stigma of being lumped into this non-existent social peer group. While he visits icons like Emilio Estevez, Demi Moore, and Rob Lowe, the exploration often feels slightly pretentious or self-pitying. It is a justifiable exercise given the cultural weight of films like The Breakfast Club and St. Elmo's Fire, but it lacks the meaningful depth a different directorial approach might have uncovered.

"The real lost opportunity is missing out on seeing a group reunion of the performers all together... in the small, solo settings the examination comes off at best, slightly pretentious and at worst, self-pitying."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Andrew McCarthy
• Featuring: Emilio Estevez, Demi Moore, Rob Lowe, Ally Sheedy
• Special Appearance: David Blum (Writer of the original article)
• Platform: Hulu

The Vision

Andrew McCarthy’s vision is deeply personal, framed as a journey to reconcile with his own past. He focuses on the "trauma" of the label—being belittled or losing out on prestigious roles—but the film eventually admits the moniker has evolved into a badge of merit. Unfortunately, by keeping the interviews to intimate, one-on-one settings, the film misses the electric potential of a group dynamic. It treats these 1980s touchstones as important time capsules, yet fails to provide an insightful or particularly entertaining narrative for the very generation that grew up with them.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• The Missing Members: Notably absent from the new interviews are Molly Ringwald and Judd Nelson, whose lack of participation highlights the lingering divisiveness of the "Brat Pack" label.
• The Original Sin: The documentary features a face-to-face meeting between McCarthy and David Blum, the journalist who coined the term, marking their first conversation in nearly 40 years.
• Hulu Hit: Despite critical mixed reviews, the documentary became a massive viewership success, proving the enduring allure of John Hughes-era nostalgia.

✅ Pros

• Fascinating to see 80s icons reflecting on their youth.
• Highlights the cultural importance of 1980s youth time capsules.
• The confrontation with the original article's author is a highlight.

❌ Cons

• Missing the "big win" of a full cast reunion.
• Can feel self-pitying given the actual advantages of their fame.
• Surface-level analysis that lacks genuine industry insight.

🏆 Final Verdict

A nostalgic but ultimately shallow walk down memory lane. BRATS is worth a watch for the sheer 80s pedigree, but it leaves you wishing for a more meaningful examination of its famous subjects.

View original review on Letterboxd

The Tomorrow War

The Tomorrow War (2021)

An Entertaining Sci-Fi Action Yarn

by Ray Manukay

★★★☆☆

Watched 10 Jun 2024

The Tomorrow War delivers an entertaining mix of time travel, sci-fi, and action. Buoyed by likable leads and solid production value, it offers more than just a typical summer blockbuster, weaving in thoughtful concepts alongside its high-stakes premise.

🎬 Production Credits

Director: Chris McKay

Writer: Zach Dean

Cinematography: Larry Fong

Editor: Roger Barton

Music: Lorne Balfe

Studio: Amazon Studios

An effective, subtle analogy to the dangers of climate change to society, and to the planet. — Ray Manukay

Ideas and Concepts

The film is anchored by some interesting ideas and concepts, specifically regarding the weight of the future on the present generation. Unlike many direct-to-streaming efforts, the special effects here are decent and immersive, particularly the creature designs of the White Spikes.

💡 Fun Facts

• This was the live-action directorial debut for Chris McKay, who previously directed The LEGO Batman Movie.
• The film was originally intended for a theatrical release by Paramount before being sold to Amazon due to the pandemic.
• The "White Spikes" aliens were designed to look like they could feasibly overwhelm a modern military through sheer speed and aggression.

The Performances

• Chris Pratt: Brings his signature likability to the role of Dan Forester, anchoring the emotional stakes.
• Yvonne Strahovski: Provides a strong, grounded performance that carries much of the film's second half.
• J.K. Simmons: Memorable as Dan’s estranged, survivalist father.

✅ Pros

• Strong chemistry between Pratt and Strahovski.
• Impressive special effects for a streaming movie.
• Subtle but effective climate change analogy.

❌ Cons

• Some logical leaps in the time-travel mechanics.

Read the original review on Letterboxd

🏆 Final Verdict

An entertaining sci-fi action yarn with interesting concepts that make it worth a watch for fans of the genre.

The First Omen

 

The First Omen (2024)

A Vital, Visceral Addition to the Catholic Horror Canon

★★★☆☆

Unsettling and disturbing, this prequel fulfills the creepy, suspenseful promise of the originals while pushing into terrifying new territory.

Directed by Arkasha Stevenson, The First Omen is a surprisingly bold and vital addition to the franchise. Featuring a brave, unhinged performance by Nell Tiger Free, the film is drenched in dread and Catholic nightmare horror. While there is plenty of gore and body horror to satisfy genre fans, the most horrifying aspect is the believable hubris of the evil sect portrayed within the institution. The filmmakers make a terrifyingly grounded case for why such a scenario could be justifiable within their own twisted logic.

"We'd like to believe the real institution wouldn't have a rogue offshoot trying to bring on the apocalypse... But the filmmakers make a great case, as well as Roman Catholic history, why this terrifying scenario would not just be possible, but justifiable."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Arkasha Stevenson
• Starring: Nell Tiger Free, Bill Nighy, Sônia Braga
• Supporting: Ralph Ineson, Charles Dance
• Cinematography: Aaron Morton

The Vision

Arkasha Stevenson brings a sophisticated, European-horror sensibility to this prequel, moving away from standard jump scares toward a slow-building atmospheric rot. The vision centers on the loss of bodily autonomy and the terrifying length an institution will go to maintain its power. By grounding the supernatural threat in real historical anxieties regarding the Church in the 1970s, Stevenson elevates the material from a simple franchise tie-in to a standalone work of "prestige" horror.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• The "Possession" Homage: Nell Tiger Free's intense physical performance in a hallway sequence was a direct, intentional homage to Isabelle Adjani’s iconic breakdown in the 1981 film Possession.
• Rating Battle: The film reportedly had to go through several cuts to avoid an NC-17 rating due to its graphic "birthing" and body horror sequences.
• Soundtrack DNA: The score incorporates motifs from Jerry Goldsmith’s original Oscar-winning The Omen score, specifically "Ave Satani," to bridge the gap between the two eras.

✅ Pros

• Powerhouse, transformative lead performance by Nell Tiger Free.
• Exceptional production design and unsettling atmosphere.
• Creative and genuinely disturbing body horror sequences.

❌ Cons

• Certain plot beats rely heavily on franchise familiarity.
• Extremely bleak and potentially upsetting for some viewers.

🏆 Final Verdict

A rare prequel that actually justifies its own existence. The First Omen is a haunting, well-crafted nightmare that proves there is still plenty of life (and death) left in this classic franchise.

View original review on Letterboxd

The Fall Guy

The Fall Guy (2024)

A Handsome and Affable Tribute to the Stunt Community

★★★☆☆

Harmless summer action fun that coasts on the immense charm of its A-list leads.

Directed by David Leitch, The Fall Guy is a film that is handsome and affable to a fault. It serves as harmless summer action fun where the stakes are low and the ultimate outcome for our protagonists is never truly in doubt. While the action is consistently entertaining and the scale is impressive, the experience doesn't really amount to much in the long run. It is a pleasant way to kill a few hours, even if it lacks that extra "gear" to make it truly memorable or special.

"Emily Blunt and Ryan Gosling are having loads of fun, charming and easy on the eyes. The action is entertaining... But it all doesn't really amount to much and nothing is really memorable or special."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: David Leitch
• Starring: Ryan Gosling, Emily Blunt
• Supporting: Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Hannah Waddingham, Winston Duke
• Stunt Coordinator: Chris O'Hara

The Vision

David Leitch, himself a former stuntman, clearly intended this as a love letter to the unsung heroes of the film industry. The vision is bright, loud, and energetic, focusing on practical effects and high-octane choreography. The chemistry between Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt is the film's strongest asset, providing a romantic spark that grounds the chaotic meta-narrative. It is a directorial showcase of technical prowess, even if the script stays firmly within the safety of blockbuster conventions.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Record Breaker: Stunt driver Logan Holladay broke a Guinness World Record during production for the most cannon rolls in a car, completing eight and a half rotations.
• The "Stunt Designer" Credit: In a move to gain more recognition for the craft, the film credited Chris O'Hara as a "Stunt Designer" rather than a coordinator, a first for the industry.
• TV Origins: The film is a loose adaptation of the 1980s television series of the same name, which starred Lee Majors (who makes a cameo in this version).

✅ Pros

• Immense, effortless chemistry between Gosling and Blunt.
• Top-tier practical stunt work and entertaining action sequences.
• A fun, meta-look at the reality of film production.

❌ Cons

• Low-stakes plot that feels largely predictable.
• Lacks a lasting emotional impact or unique narrative "hook."
• Feels a bit "safe" given the talent involved on both sides of the camera.

🏆 Final Verdict

A solid, breezy summer blockbuster. While it won't redefine the genre, The Fall Guy is a charming enough ride to justify the price of admission for the star power alone.

View original review on Letterboxd

Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes

 

Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes (2024)

A Breathtaking Spectacle and Bold New Chapter

★★★☆☆

A worthy addition to the rebooted saga that pairs epic CGI performances with fascinating future possibilities.

Directed by Wes Ball, Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes is a worthy addition to the rebooted movie adventure. The film continues the franchise's strong tradition of excellent CGI performances and epic storytelling. While it suffers from minor pacing issues at times, it is commendable that the filmmakers are confident enough to "take the foot off the gas" to explore the universe more deeply. When the tension is finally amped up, the result is a breathtaking spectacle that successfully sets the stage for the next phase of this expanding saga.

"The movie also sets up the continuation of the narrative with some fascinating possibilities. Which leaves us in a place of wanting more in the tale, which is the best place to be for the future of this fascinating and expanding saga."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Wes Ball
• Starring: Owen Teague (Noa), Freya Allan (Mae), Kevin Durand (Proximus Caesar)
• Supporting: Peter Macon, William H. Macy
• Visual Effects: Wētā FX

The Vision

Wes Ball takes over the directorial reins from Matt Reeves, shifting the focus generations after the death of Caesar. His vision is one of a "post-post-apocalyptic" world where nature has reclaimed the earth, and ape clans have diverged into unique cultures. By leaning into world-building over constant action, Ball creates a more meditative experience that honors the legacy of the previous trilogy while carving out a fresh identity. The technical mastery provided by Wētā FX ensures that the emotional beats of the ape protagonists remain the film's beating heart.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Generational Leap: The film takes place roughly 300 years after War for the Planet of the Apes, meaning the legend of Caesar has evolved into a religious or mythical figure.
• Ape School: The actors spent six weeks in "Ape School" with movement coach Alain Gauthier to unlearn human movements and perfect the specific gait and mannerisms of chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans.
• Location Scouting: Much of the lush, reclaimed scenery was filmed on location in New South Wales, Australia, utilizing real environments to ground the heavy CGI elements in reality.

✅ Pros

• Industry-leading CGI and motion-capture performances.
• Breathtaking action spectacles and cinematography.
• Intriguing world-building that leaves you wanting more.

❌ Cons

• Occasional pacing lulls during the middle act.
• Struggles slightly to emerge from the massive shadow of the Caesar trilogy.

🏆 Final Verdict

A triumphant return to the world of the apes. Despite minor pacing issues, the film delivers the "spectacle" promised and leaves the franchise in an incredibly exciting place for future chapters.

View original review on Letterboxd

Abigail

 

Abigail (2024)

An Amusing and Crowd-Friendly Thriller

★★★☆☆

Watched 12 May 2024 — A fun, gory mashup that delivers the goods even if the marketing spoiled the surprise.

Directed by the "Radio Silence" duo Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, Abigail is a rowdy exploration of the kidnap-thriller genre with a supernatural bite. Despite its main twist being heavily featured in the trailers, the film manages to maintain momentum through a series of fun narrative turns and plenty of visceral jump scares. It succeeds primarily as a group experience, relying on a game ensemble cast who clearly enjoyed playing within the bloody confines of its central premise.

"Best enjoyed in the company of good friends and a rowdy audience talking and laughing at the screen. [It is] an amusing and crowd friendly thriller/comedy."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Directors: [Matt Bettinelli-Olpin & Tyler Gillett](https://www.imdb.com)
• Starring: [Melissa Barrera](https://www.imdb.com), Dan Stevens, Alisha Weir
• Supporting: Kathryn Newton, William Catlett, Kevin Durand, Angus Cloud
• Studio: Universal Pictures

The Vision

The directorial vision follows the established "Radio Silence" playbook seen in Ready or Not: mixing high-stakes horror with dark, comedic levity. The film focuses on subverting expectations of the "victim" and "predator" dynamic. While the marketing may have dampened the initial shock of the reveal, the filmmakers double down on stylistic gore and energetic pacing to keep the audience engaged. It’s a movie that prioritizes the "blast" of the moment over deep lore, aiming for high-energy entertainment that flourishes in a theatrical setting.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Angus Cloud’s Final Role: This film marks one of the final on-screen appearances for [Angus Cloud](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com), best known for his role in Euphoria.
• Ballerina Vampire: Alisha Weir, who plays Abigail, performed many of her own dance-inspired stunts, drawing on her musical theater background (Matilda the Musical).
• Classic Roots: The film is a loose, modern reimagining of the 1936 classic Dracula's Daughter.

✅ Pros

• Great performances from a high-energy ensemble.
• Plenty of fun gore and effective jump scares.
• Excellent choice for a group viewing experience.

❌ Cons

• Marketing spoiled the most significant twist.
• Follows fairly standard horror/thriller tropes.
• Narrative turns can feel predictable for genre veterans.

🏆 Final Verdict

A blood-soaked, amusing romp that proves the "Radio Silence" team still knows how to throw a party on screen. Even if you know what's coming, the ride is worth the price of admission for the fun alone.

View on Letterboxd

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare

 

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare (2024)

The Best Popcorn Action Film of the Summer

★★★½☆

Watched 12 May 2024 — A high-octane throwback that prioritizes "good natured fun" over heavy-handed dramatics.

Directed by Guy Ritchie, The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare cements his status as a premier crowd-pleasing action director. Moving away from his early independent "Tarantino-esque" roots, Ritchie has evolved into a versatile filmmaker capable of tackling everything from Aladdin to the tortured drama of The Covenant. Here, he returns to the "men-on-a-mission" subgenre with his trademark visual flair and breathtaking practical effects, delivering a stylized WWII romp that feels like a spiritual successor to his work on The Man from U.N.C.L.E.

"Is there a better prolific mainstream director working today than Guy Ritchie? One can try and make an argument. But for my money I'd say no."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Guy Ritchie
• Starring: Henry Cavill, Alan Ritchson, Eiza González
• Supporting: Henry Golding, Alex Pettyfer, Til Schweiger
• Source Material: Based on the book by Damien Lewis

The Vision

Ritchie’s vision for this project is refreshingly straightforward: a focus on affable, attractive characters fighting "uncomplicated evil Nazis." By stripping away the non-linear complexity of his early career, he leans into a kinetic, muscular style of filmmaking. The film functions as a celebration of British resilience and "ungentlemanly" tactics, utilizing practical special effects to ground the stylized violence. It proves Ritchie can master the big-budget Hollywood machine while maintaining the distinct, energetic edge that makes his work stand out in the mainstream landscape.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• The Bond Connection: Henry Cavill’s character, Gus March-Phillipps, was a primary real-life inspiration for Ian Fleming’s James Bond. Fleming himself is a character in the film.
• The Ritchie/Cavill Reunion: This marks the second collaboration between Ritchie and Cavill, following 2015's The Man from U.N.C.L.E.
• Historical Basis: The film depicts Operation Postmaster, a secret mission so controversial the British government kept it classified for decades.

✅ Pros

• Memorable performances across the entire ensemble cast.
• Breathtaking, practical special effects and visuals.
• Pure, unapologetic "popcorn" fun.

❌ Cons

• Lacks the narrative depth of The Covenant.
• Villains are somewhat one-dimensional "evil Nazis."
• Follows a very familiar mission-movie template.

🏆 Final Verdict

A triumphant confirmation of Guy Ritchie’s status as a master of the modern action film. If you want high stakes without the pretension, this is the best ride of the summer. Go watch it, then head to Netflix for The Gentlemen.

View on Letterboxd

Unfrosted

 

Unfrosted (2024)

An Unabashedly Silly Sugar Rush

★★★☆☆

Watched 07 May 2024 — A bizarre, ridiculous comedy that succeeds if you check your "critical eye" at the door.

Directed by and starring Jerry Seinfeld, Unfrosted is a surreal, candy-colored reimagining of the corporate battle to invent the Pop-Tart. Eschewing the trend of "gritty" brand biopics, the film leans into pure absurdity. It is a movie with a singular mission: to generate laughs at any cost. While it won't satisfy those seeking "high art" or a realistic historical account, its commitment to being a "bizarre" and "ridiculous" piece of broad comedy makes it a refreshing, harmless diversion for those in the right frame of mind.

"If the audience member goes in with a negative critical eye... they are missing the point. [It] was created with only one task in mind, to give the audience laughs."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: [Jerry Seinfeld](https://www.imdb.com)
• Starring: Jerry Seinfeld, Melissa McCarthy, Jim Gaffigan
• Supporting: Hugh Grant, Amy Schumer, Christian Slater, James Marsden
• Studio: [Netflix](https://www.netflix.com)

The Vision

Seinfeld’s directorial debut is a rejection of modern cinematic self-importance. His vision is rooted in the "anything for a laugh" ethos of classic 1960s comedies and variety shows. The film intentionally prioritizes absurdity over plot cohesion, utilizing a massive ensemble of comedy legends to populate a hyper-stylized version of Battle Creek, Michigan. By leaning into the "ridiculous," Seinfeld creates a space where broad comedy can flourish without the constraints of "thought-provoking" expectations, aiming directly for the audience's "funny bone."

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Hugh Grant's Tony the Tiger: Hugh Grant portrays a disgruntled Shakespearean actor forced to wear a Tony the Tiger costume, a meta-commentary on his own career evolution.
• Seinfeld's First: This marks Jerry Seinfeld's first time directing a feature film, despite his decades of dominance in television and stand-up.
• Product Placement Parody: While the film is about Pop-Tarts, Kellogg’s was not an official partner; the film actually parodies the very concept of the "brand origin story" popularized by movies like Air and BlackBerry.

✅ Pros

• Pure, harmless, and quick-hitting laughs.
• Stacked ensemble cast having a blast with the material.
• Refreshingly unabashed about its own silliness.

❌ Cons

• Not for everyone; broad comedy can be polarizing.
• Lacks a challenging or stimulating narrative.
• May feel "all over the place" to a critical viewer.

🏆 Final Verdict

A sugary, strange, and entirely ridiculous trip that succeeds if you're looking for simple fun. If you're willing to turn off your brain and enjoy the absurd, Unfrosted delivers exactly what it promises.

View on Letterboxd

Civil War

 

Civil War (2024)

A Stunning, Disturbing, and Thought-Provoking Ride

★★★½☆

Watched 14 Apr 2024 — A haunting exploration of the internal war waged by those documenting humanity's collapse.

Directed by Alex Garland, Civil War subverts expectations of a political manifesto. Instead of focusing on the "why" of a modern American divide, the film examines the "how" through the lens of wartime photojournalists. It is a visceral journey through breathtaking action and haunting sequences that challenge the viewer’s own morality. While the plot meanders through various horrors, the film's strength lies in its refusal to offer simple answers, instead forcing an assessment of the price paid for "objectivity" in the face of absolute inhumanity.

"It's really about the Civil War going on within individual journalists. The war to maintain humanity in the face of inhumanity... the war between chasing thrills and honestly uncovering truths."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: [Alex Garland](https://www.imdb.com)
• Starring: [Kirsten Dunst](https://www.imdb.com), Wagner Moura, Cailee Spaeny
• Supporting: Stephen McKinley Henderson, Nick Offerman, Jesse Plemons
• Studio: [A24](https://a24films.com)

The Vision

Garland’s vision is intentionally apolitical and clinical, mirroring the mindset of his protagonists. By stripping away the specific ideological causes of the conflict, he shifts the focus to the sensory experience of war and the psychological toll of witnessing atrocities. The film functions as a "wake-up call" that doesn't tell you what to think, but rather demands that you *look*. It’s a handsomely executed, messy assembly of themes—ranging from adrenaline addiction to the ethics of journalism—that ultimately aims to spark deep, difficult conversations long after the credits roll.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Immersive Sound: The gunfire in the film was recorded using high-fidelity equipment to match the actual decibel levels of real weaponry, creating an intentionally jarring auditory experience.
• Jesse Plemons' Cameo: Plemons was a late addition to the cast, stepping in to play the terrifying soldier in the red sunglasses after another actor dropped out just days before filming.
• The WF and 19th State: The "Western Forces" (Texas and California) were chosen as allies specifically to avoid aligning the film with real-world 2024 American political maps.

✅ Pros

• Breathtaking action and stunning visual execution.
• Profound, thought-provoking themes regarding journalism.
• Exceptional performances, particularly from Kirsten Dunst.

❌ Cons

• The narrative can feel "messily assembled" at times.
• Meandering plot may frustrate those looking for a traditional war story.
• Ambiguous messaging can leave viewers with "mixed feelings."

🏆 Final Verdict

A masterpiece of tension that refuses to provide the comfort of a simple message. It hits every viewer differently, making it one of the most significant and conversational films of the year. Absorb it, then assess it.

View on Letterboxd

Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire

 

Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire (2024)

Giant Monsters, Solid FX, and Pure Fun

★★★☆☆

Watched 28 Mar 2024 — A film that knows exactly what its audience wants: building-sized titans pummeling each other to the death.

Directed by Adam Wingard, Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire is an unapologetic spectacle that prioritizes scale over subtext. While it’s easy to dismiss a movie about giant monsters as "silly," the artistic merits here deserve recognition. The film successfully balances a two-hour narrative where the human characters manage to hold our interest between the main events. Most impressively, the special effects team manages to elicit genuine affection and animosity toward these CGI protagonists, proving that even a low-bar "monster mash" requires high-level craftsmanship to succeed.

"What they likely are looking for are glowing comments about great special effects and stimulating action of building size monsters battling each other to the death. Godzilla x Kong The New Empire delivers just that."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Adam Wingard
• Starring: Rebecca Hall, Brian Tyree Henry, Dan Stevens
• Supporting: Kaylee Hottle, Fala Chen
• Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures / Legendary

The Vision

Wingard’s vision for the "MonsterVerse" continues to lean away from the grounded realism of earlier entries in favor of vibrant, neon-soaked fantasy. He embraces the legacy of the "rubber suit" era while utilizing modern technology to make the action feel kinetic and personal. The focus remains on the personality of the monsters—treating Kong and Godzilla as silent actors with their own arcs. It’s an entertaining effort that aims for "solid special effects" and "affable creatures," ensuring that fans of the franchise leave the theater satisfied.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• The Guest Reunion: This film reunites director Adam Wingard with actor Dan Stevens, who starred in Wingard's 2014 cult hit The Guest.
• Evolved Godzilla: The pink "evolved" look for Godzilla was inspired by the monster's ability to store massive amounts of solar energy, a nod to the character's ever-changing biology in Toho history.
• Silent Protagonists: A significant portion of the film features no human dialogue, relying entirely on the visual storytelling and "acting" of the CGI monsters.

✅ Pros

• Top-tier special effects and monster action.
• Human characters that actually manage to stay interesting.
• A fun, entertaining ride from start to finish.

❌ Cons

• Story elements and dialogue are secondary to the action.
• The plot leans heavily into "silly" territory.
• Not for those seeking a "realistic" or deep narrative.

🏆 Final Verdict

A triumphant celebration of giant-scale destruction. If you're here for titans pummeling each other, stop reading and go watch it—you won't be disappointed.

View on Letterboxd

Ghostbusters Frozen Empire

 

Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (2024)

A Heartwarming Family Film in Ghostly Garb

★★½☆☆

Watched 27 Mar 2024 — Solid as a multi-generational family drama, but lacking the edgy thrills of its iconic roots.

Directed by Gil Kenan, Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire finds the franchise shifting gears into wholesome family entertainment. While it remains a "not bad" movie, it struggles with a significant identity crisis: it lacks the big comedic beats and scary thrills that once defined the brand. Instead, it positions itself as a heartwarming story centered on a mixed family of several generations. It’s a literal and figurative coming-together of the old guard and the new kids, functioning more as a moral tale than a supernatural thriller.

"Can a Ghostbusters movie still be good if it doesn't have many laughs or any scary thrills? ... What we have here is a heartwarming family film. And on that level, it delivers solidly."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Gil Kenan
• Starring: Paul Rudd, Carrie Coon, Finn Wolfhard, Mckenna Grace
• The Originals: Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson
• Studio: Sony Pictures

The Vision

The directorial vision moves further away from the edgy, improv-heavy "comedy thriller" roots established by Harold Ramis and Dan Aykroyd in 1984. This entry feels more aligned with the animated series' "silly fun" and "morality tales" approach. Kenan focuses on the "chaperone" dynamic, utilizing the legacy characters to anchor a story about family unity and overcoming adversity. It’s a soft reboot that prioritizes sentimental heart over the sharp, scientific skepticism that made the original world-building so iconic.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Alternative Casting: The original 1984 film was initially written for John Belushi and Eddie Murphy. Murphy eventually passed to film [Beverly Hills Cop](https://www.imdb.com).
• The Firehouse Return: This film marks the first time the franchise has fully returned to the iconic [Hook & Ladder Company 8](https://en.wikipedia.org) firehouse in Tribeca as a primary base since 1989.
• Practical Slimer: The production team opted for a mix of CGI and practical puppetry for Slimer to capture the nostalgic feel of the original "ugly little spud."

✅ Pros

• Solid, heartwarming family dynamics at the core.
• Great to see the original Ghostbusters back in action.
• High production value and nostalgic set pieces.

❌ Cons

• Hardly any comedic moments or big laughs.
• Lacks the scary thrills and tension of the original.
• Feels a bit too "safe" for an edgy franchise.

🏆 Final Verdict

A conflicted transition for the franchise. If you’re looking for a wholesome family uniting for a heroic cause, you’ll find it here. If you’re looking for the edgy wit of Bill Murray’s heyday, you might leave feeling a bit cold.

View on Letterboxd

Road House 2024

 

Road House (2024)

Unabashedly Silly, Simple, and Combat-Ready

★★★☆☆

Watched 22 Mar 2024 — A positive re-imagining that tosses logic out the window in favor of a fun, uncomplicated ride.

Directed by Doug Liman, this 2024 update of Road House trades the cult-hit status of the 1989 original for high-octane modern polish. Starring the critically acclaimed Jake Gyllenhaal, the film wisely avoids trying to be a "classic" or standing up to deep scrutiny. Instead, it leans into its identity as pure entertainment, delivering exactly what the title promises: fighting, followed by more fighting. It’s a breezy, big-budget remake that lives up to its predecessor's humble success by keeping the stakes clear and the action relentless.

"Everyone knows this movie exists just to entertain. And not to stand up to any kind of deep scrutiny. If the viewer enters looking to have a fun ride, they are in good hands. Lay back and enjoy the fights."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Doug Liman
• Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Conor McGregor
• Supporting: Daniela Melchior, Billy Magnussen, Jessica Williams
• Studio: Amazon MGM Studios

The Vision

Liman, the filmmaker behind The Bourne Identity, brings a kinetic energy to the Florida Keys setting. His vision eschews the "serious" tone of many modern remakes, opting instead for a vibrant, almost cartoonish physicality. The inclusion of MMA superstar Conor McGregor in an over-the-top debut performance signals the film's intent: it is a "home video success" spirit amplified by a blockbuster budget. It doesn't aim to fix a plot that didn't need reimagining; it simply provides a new sandbox for impressive sequences and "unabashedly silly fun."

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• UFC Integration: To ensure authenticity, scenes were filmed during a live [UFC 285](https://www.ufc.com) event, with Gyllenhaal actually stepping into the Octagon.
• McGregor's Debut: This film marks the professional acting debut of Conor McGregor, who reportedly became the highest-paid debut actor in history for the role.
• Stunt Innovation: Liman used a "multi-pass" filming technique for the fights, allowing actors to throw real, fast punches that were digitally composited to look like they connected without hurting the performers.

✅ Pros

• Jake Gyllenhaal brings charisma and grit to the lead role.
• Impressive, modern fight sequences and choreography.
• Conor McGregor’s wild, over-the-top performance.

❌ Cons

• Logic and narrative depth are secondary to the action.
• Doesn't necessarily "need" to exist as a remake.
• Might feel too "silly" for viewers expecting a serious drama.

🏆 Final Verdict

A fun, high-energy ride that respects the spirit of the original by not taking itself too seriously. It’s a perfect "popcorn" movie—just lay back, ignore the logic, and enjoy the show.

View on Letterboxd